POULTRY FEED PLANT FOR SALE

Yes. This is one of the most common requests from commercial feed producers. Before recommending any equipment, our engineers evaluate your building dimensions, column locations, floor loading capacity, material flow, and future expansion plans. In many cases, we can customize the poultry feed plant layout to fit an existing facility, significantly reducing construction costs and project timelines.

Usually yes. While taller buildings provide more layout flexibility, many poultry feed plant projects are installed in facilities with height restrictions. We can optimize equipment arrangement, select suitable conveying systems, and redesign the process flow to maximize available space without sacrificing production efficiency.

Not necessarily. Whether a pit is required depends on your raw material receiving method and site conditions. Many customers prefer pit-free designs to reduce civil engineering costs and avoid drainage issues. We can offer both traditional pit-type and above-ground receiving solutions for a poultry feed plant.

For customers producing layer feed, broiler feed, breeder feed, or medicated feed, cross-contamination control is critical. We address this through optimized batching systems, low-residue mixers, proper conveying design, and intelligent sequencing. The solution depends on your production requirements and quality standards.

Yes. Many customers use challenging ingredients such as DDGS, wheat bran, rice bran, cassava meal, sunflower meal, cottonseed meal, feather meal, or high-moisture by-products. We customize storage, feeding, grinding, mixing, and pelleting systems according to the physical characteristics of your raw materials to ensure stable operation.

Absolutely. Many of our projects involve modernization rather than complete replacement. Depending on the condition of your current equipment, we can upgrade individual sections such as grinding, batching, mixing, pelleting, cooling, or automation systems while retaining usable equipment to reduce investment costs.

ROI depends on production volume, raw material costs, labor savings, feed quality improvements, and local market demand. During the project planning stage, our engineers help customers evaluate production economics and select the most cost-effective configuration rather than simply recommending the largest system.

Not every project requires full automation. Some customers prioritize labor reduction, while others focus on formula accuracy or traceability. We offer solutions ranging from semi-automatic systems to fully automatic poultry feed plants with PLC control, automatic batching, production monitoring, and data management functions.

The rated output of a pellet mill alone does not determine actual plant performance. We evaluate the entire production process, including grinding fineness, conditioning efficiency, raw material characteristics, die configuration, cooling capacity, and conveying systems. This ensures the poultry feed plant can maintain stable production over long operating periods.

Yes. Many successful feed producers begin with a moderate capacity and expand later. During the initial design phase, we can reserve space, electrical capacity, conveying routes, and control interfaces for future equipment additions. This allows capacity expansion with minimal disruption to ongoing production.

In many cases, yes. We have experience upgrading and expanding feed mills that previously used equipment from European, Turkish, South American, and local manufacturers. Our engineers can evaluate compatibility requirements for conveyors, bins, batching systems, pellet mills, and control systems to develop a practical integration plan.

The more information available, the more accurate the solution will be. Ideally, customers provide:

• Target capacity (T/H)
• Feed types and formulas
• Raw material list
• Existing building drawings (if available)
• Automation requirements
• Local power supply information
• Future expansion plans

With these details, our engineering team can develop a customized poultry feed plant solution rather than a generic equipment quotation.

The poultry feed plant price depends on capacity, automation level, feed type, and equipment configuration. A small farm-scale system and a large fully automatic poultry feed plant require very different investments. RICHI provides customized quotations based on your actual requirements, ensuring you only pay for the equipment you need while maintaining room for future expansion.

Yes. Many customers start with 1-2 T/H and later expand production. A properly designed chicken feed plant can improve feed quality, reduce labor costs, and increase profitability from day one. We can also reserve expansion interfaces for future growth.

Absolutely. A modern poultry pellet feed plant can produce feed for broilers, layers, breeders, ducks, geese, quails, and other poultry species. Formula changes can be completed through the batching and mixing system without major equipment modifications.

Our poultry feed plant machinery can process corn, soybean meal, wheat, sorghum, rice bran, sunflower meal, cassava meal, DDGS, fish meal, meat and bone meal, premixes, vitamins, minerals, and many local agricultural by-products. We customize the process according to your available raw materials.

A modern automatic poultry feed plant requires surprisingly few operators. Depending on capacity, most projects can be managed by only 2-6 workers per shift thanks to PLC automation, automatic batching, intelligent control systems, and centralized monitoring.

Broiler gets requested the most, but it’s far from the only thing our poultry feed plant designs get built around. Layer feed runs a completely different calcium load — limestone alone can sit at 8-10% of the formula instead of barely 1% in broiler feed — and that shifts mixing and storage requirements more than people expect going in. Duck and goose feed lean on fiber tolerance most chicken formulas can’t handle: rice bran, alfalfa meal, sometimes sugar beet pulp, depending on what’s locally available and cheap to source. Turkey starter feed needs protein up around 28%, the highest of the group, while quail feed needs particle sizes under 1.5mm simply because the birds are small enough that anything coarser ends up wasted on the feeder floor.

What actually makes the difference isn’t knowing these numbers exist — it’s adjusting the equipment around them, project by project. Our engineers reworked crushing and mixing settings for a client in Algeria running barley and wheat bran instead of the usual corn-soy base, since their local grain supply didn’t include much soybean to begin with. A duck feed line we built in Malaysia needed rice bran handled at a higher inclusion rate than we’d normally configure for, because that’s the regional byproduct actually available there. A combined poultry-cattle plant in Kazakhstan needed formula and die changeover engineered in from day one rather than retrofitted later, since mixed livestock operations are common across that market.

None of that comes off a catalog spec sheet. It comes from having engineered enough of these lines, across enough raw material situations, that an unusual formula request stops being unusual. If your raw material or bird type doesn’t fit a standard configuration, that’s exactly the kind of project worth bringing to us directly — working out the right crushing, mixing, and conditioning setup before committing to equipment is the part that actually matters.

All three process flows pull from the same family of equipment, but they diverge in ways that matter the moment you’re actually committing to a poultry feed plant order, not just reading a flowchart. A standard pellet line runs the full sequence — receiving, cleaning, crushing, batching, mixing, pelletizing, cooling, crumbling, sieving, packaging — and the finished product comes out dense and durable, built to hold together through transport and storage. Mash feed cuts that sequence short: receiving, cleaning, crushing, batching, mixing, straight to packaging, with no pelleting stage at all. Lower equipment cost, but the finished product handles and stores differently than pellets do, which matters more than people expect once it’s sitting in a warehouse for a few weeks.

Premix runs on a different track entirely — raw material pre-treatment, batching, mixing, then packing and storage — and even though that sequence looks almost identical to the mash process on paper, the equipment underneath isn’t interchangeable. Premix mixing typically runs on stainless steel rather than standard carbon steel, partly for hygiene and partly because micro-ingredient carryover between batches becomes a real problem on standard mixer surfaces at the inclusion rates premix actually runs at.

One detail that catches buyers off guard: a mash and pellet line can share most of the same equipment right up through mixing, with the powder simply diverted to packaging before it ever reaches the pelletizer — which is exactly how we configured a 10 t/h plant for a client in Uganda who needed both formats running off a single footprint instead of two separate lines. We’ve built dedicated stainless premix systems for export clients with stricter hygiene requirements too, since that’s not a stage most poultry feed plant buyers think to ask about until a food safety auditor brings it up. If you’re not sure which of these three process flows actually fits your output goals, that’s worth working through with our engineers before locking in equipment.

All three pull from the same family of equipment, but they diverge enough to matter once you’re actually committing to a poultry feed plant order — not just reading a flowchart.

A few things worth knowing before picking one:

• Premix mixing typically runs on stainless steel rather than standard carbon steel — partly for hygiene, partly because micro-ingredient carryover between batches becomes a real problem on standard mixer surfaces at the inclusion rates premix runs at.
• A mash and pellet line can actually share most of the same equipment right up through mixing, with the powder simply diverted to packaging before it reaches the pelletizer. That’s exactly how we configured a 10 t/h plant for a client in Uganda who needed both formats running off one footprint instead of two separate lines.
• We’ve also built dedicated stainless premix systems for export clients with stricter hygiene requirements — not a stage most poultry feed plant buyers think to ask about until a food safety auditor brings it up.

If you’re not sure which of these three process flows actually fits your output goals, that’s worth working through with our engineers before locking in equipment.

More than most buyers expect going in — configuration depends on far more than just tonnage. Equipment, layout, and automation level all get matched to what you’re actually trying to produce.

By Animal Type

By Product Form

1. Poultry pellet feed plant
2. Poultry mash feed plant
3. Poultry premix plant
4. Poultry concentrate feed plant

By Automation Level

• Manual poultry feed plant
• Semi-automatic poultry feed plant
• Fully automatic poultry feed plant
• PLC-controlled poultry feed plant

Capacity, Cost, and Application Range

What ties all of this together: we manufacture every piece of equipment ourselves — we’re not reselling someone else’s line under our name. Beyond that, our team functions as general contractor, engineer, steel fabricator, and construction millwright on a single project, covering transportation, installation, commissioning, training, and after-sales tracking from one source rather than coordinating across separate vendors.

Our business scope covers new poultry feed plant construction, expansion of an existing facility, and transformation of older lines into something closer to current production needs. If your project doesn’t fit neatly into one category above, that’s normal — most of what we build ends up being some combination of the categories rather than a single standard configuration, and that’s exactly the kind of project worth discussing directly with our engineering team.

Across more than a thousand client projects, it’s rare to deliver two identical configurations — capacity, finished product type, and raw material all push the design in a different direction each time. Five representative builds below give a sense of what changes and what stays consistent.

Investment Cost by Capacity

Core Systems Included

These run consistently across every capacity on this list:

• Raw material receiving and pre-cleaning system
• Crushing system
• Batching and mixing system
• Pelletizing, cooling, and screening system
• Packing and dust-collecting system
• MCC control center with mimic control panel
• Cables and cable bridge tube

From 10 t/h upward, the configuration typically adds:

• Bulk bin storage system
• Oil-adding system
• Computer-controlled batching system

From 20 t/h upward, it usually picks up two more:

• Auxiliary system
• CPP computer control system

Output by Feed Stage

Notice the output numbers shift depending on which product the line is running — a 10 t/h poultry feed plant isn’t actually producing 10 tons of every feed type equally; chick starter throughput runs lower than finisher throughput on the same equipment, since finer grinding and smaller pellet sizing simply take longer to process per ton. That’s the kind of detail that doesn’t show up on a basic spec sheet but matters once you’re planning daily output against flock size.

None of these five are templates meant to be used as-is — they’re starting references. If your raw material, building footprint, or product mix doesn’t match one of them exactly, that’s the normal case rather than the exception, and it’s worth running the numbers with our team directly before finalizing a configuration.

Twenty snapshots from different markets, different feed sizes, and wildly different timelines — which is exactly the point. No two of these came out identical, even when the capacity numbers look close on paper.

A few patterns worth noticing across that list: build time doesn’t track capacity in any straight line — Ethiopia’s 5-6 t/h plant went up in three weeks, while Uzbekistan’s 10-15 t/h project took a full year, mostly because building construction and import logistics added far more time than the equipment itself did.

Cost spreads the same way — two plants at nearly identical tonnage can land tens of thousands of dollars apart depending on automation level, feed size range, and how many species the line needs to handle on top of poultry.

RICHI has commissioned more than 200 complete design-build poultry feed plant projects over the past decade, engineered to multi-standard compliance including OSHA and NFPA, with a design and engineering team built from people who’ve spent decades in feed machinery specifically — not generalists who picked up feed equipment as one product line among many. If you want to see where your own project would land on a list like this, that’s worth running through with us directly rather than estimating from a table alone.

A few specifics, machine by machine — these are the core building blocks behind any poultry feed plant we design, before they get sized and matched to your actual throughput target.

The wide range on each line isn’t vagueness — it reflects different model sizes within the same machine type, picked based on what capacity the rest of your line is running at. A hammer mill spec’d for a 3 t/h plant and one spec’d for a 25 t/h plant share a category but not much else in terms of motor size or frame.

What doesn’t show up in a table like this is scale. A complete 1-160 t/h poultry feed plant typically needs anywhere from a few dozen to well over a hundred individual pieces of equipment and accessories once you count conveying systems, structural steel, wiring, and instrumentation alongside the core machines listed above.

We supply that full set directly — including storage silos, environmental protection equipment like dust collection systems, and laboratory instruments for ongoing quality control — rather than handing you a core equipment list and leaving the rest for you to source separately. If you want the complete equipment breakdown matched to your specific capacity, that’s worth working through with us directly.

Machinery selection has more influence on long-term profitability than most first-time buyers expect — get it wrong and you’re either over-investing in capacity you’ll never use, or stuck with a bottleneck that caps output for years. A few principles worth following, grouped by where they matter most.

Capacity Planning

• Design capacity should run roughly 15-20% above your actual target output, with each downstream stage sized 5-10% larger than the stage feeding into it — a buffer that keeps a minor underperformance in one machine from becoming a bottleneck for the whole line.
• Production scale and product type should get decided first, based on market analysis, before locking in equipment. Process technology and machine selection follow from that decision, not the other way around.

Raw Material Handling and Crushing

• Grinder selection should match both your product’s particle size requirement and your target capacity together — picking based on one and ignoring the other is a common mistake.
• A secondary negative pressure suction system on the pulverizer recovers dusty material and can lift crushing output by more than 20%. Worth budgeting for, not an easy line item to skip.
• For layer feed and concentrate production specifically, anti-segregation measures in silo and discharge design matter, since different raw materials settle and discharge differently even from identical bin geometry.

Batching and Mixing

• Bin count should match formula complexity and raw material variety — too few bins forces compromises on formula accuracy that show up later in product consistency.
• Batching scale size and count should get sized against bin count, formula, and required batching speed together, not picked off a standard spec sheet.

Pelleting and Auxiliary Systems

• Gear-transmission pellet mills run higher production efficiency and suit livestock and poultry feed production specifically.
• Steam pipeline routing from boiler to pellet mill gets overlooked more often than it should be — pipe layout directly affects steam quality reaching the conditioner, which affects pellet durability downstream.
• Molasses and other liquid additives should go in through the conditioner rather than added separately further down the line.
• Air compressor displacement is one place where oversizing is the safer mistake — undersizing causes problems that are far more expensive to fix after installation than before.

Packing and Layout

• Packing scale pricing varies considerably based on precision and speed, so it’s worth choosing on quality and service support rather than price alone.
• Decide whether bagging runs elevated or at ground level before finalizing layout — both have tradeoffs, but retrofitting this decision later gets expensive.
• Keep the layout compact to reduce footprint, but not so tight that it limits operation and maintenance access.
• Standardizing equipment models where possible improves parts interchangeability and simplifies long-term maintenance.

Choosing a Manufacturer

• Installation quality varies significantly between poultry feed plant equipment manufacturers, so vetting the installation team matters as much as vetting the machines.
• Control system choice should match your team’s skill level — full computer control runs efficiently but needs more technically skilled maintenance staff, while a mimic panel system tends to suit small and medium operations better.

We treat ourselves as responsible for how well a customer’s poultry feed plant actually runs after handover, not just for shipping equipment that matches a spec sheet — which is why these selection principles come from projects we’ve engineered, not a generic checklist. If you want help working through which of these actually apply to your situation, that’s exactly the kind of conversation worth having with our team before equipment gets ordered.

A feasibility study isn’t a formality — skipping or rushing it is usually where over-budget, undersized, or poorly sited projects start. The full study generally breaks down into these areas:

1. Market forecast and demand analysis — Sizing the regional market for finished feed before committing to a capacity, since building bigger than local demand supports just ties up capital.
2. Construction scale and product scheme — Deciding what capacity and which feed formats (pellet, mash, premix, or some combination) the plant actually needs to produce.
3. Site selection — Land access, transport routes for raw material delivery and feed distribution, and proximity to your target customer base.
4. Equipment plan and civil works plan — Matching the equipment layout to a building design, not designing the building first and forcing equipment to fit afterward.
5. Raw material and power/fuel supply — Confirming consistent access to your formula’s core ingredients and reliable power, especially in regions where grid stability isn’t guaranteed.
6. Energy efficiency and environmental impact evaluation — Dust control, emissions, and energy consumption planning, which increasingly affects permitting in addition to operating cost.
7. Health and safety assessment — Worker safety provisions built into the design itself, not added as an afterthought once equipment is already running.
8. Organizational structure and staffing plan — How many people the operation actually needs, and what skill level each role requires.
9. Project implementation timeline — Realistic phasing from groundbreaking through commissioning, since construction and equipment delivery rarely run on identical schedules.
10. Investment estimate — A full cost breakdown covering equipment, construction, and the surrounding infrastructure together, not equipment cost alone.
11. Financing plan — How the project gets funded and over what repayment structure, if financing is involved at all.
12. Financial evaluation — Projected return on investment against realistic production and sales volume, not best-case assumptions.
13. Social impact evaluation — Local employment and community impact, which matters for both permitting and reputation in the region.
14. Investment risk analysis — What could go wrong — currency fluctuation, raw material price swings, regulatory change — and how exposed the project actually is to each.

Compressing or stretching these estimates to fit a number someone wants to hear is exactly how feasibility studies stop being useful. Local government regulations and actual market conditions should drive the numbers, not the other way around.

A fair number of these areas overlap directly with what we help clients work through before committing to a poultry feed plant order — equipment and civil layout planning, raw material and process compatibility, energy and safety considerations tied to standards like OSHA and NFPA.

That’s not incidental; it’s part of why our design team gets brought into feasibility conversations earlier than just the equipment-quoting stage on most projects. If you’re still in the planning phase and haven’t locked down capacity or layout yet, that’s a good point to start the conversation with us rather than after the feasibility study is finished.

Four decision points drive the process design, and they get worked through in roughly this order on most projects.

1. Batching Before Crushing, or Crushing Before Batching

2. Single-Stage or Two-Stage Crushing

Crushing typically processes 50-80% of total raw material volume and accounts for 60-70% of total power draw in powder feed production — by far the most energy-intensive single stage in the whole line.

• Single-stage crushing: one pulverizer fitted with a standard classification screen. Straightforward setup, but energy-hungry relative to output, which is why it mostly fits smaller mills.
• Two-stage (secondary) crushing: two grinders at different specifications running in sequence, typically cutting energy consumption by 25-50% compared to single-stage — the standard choice once a plant is running at large-scale capacity.

3. Process Flow by Product Type

• Raw material receiving: transport, weighing, cleaning, drying, storage — exact sequence depends on whether the raw material arrives as grain, byproduct, or liquid additive.
• Powder finished product: crushing, batching, mixing.
• Pellet processing: granulation, oil or fat spraying, cooling, screening, and extrusion when the formula calls for it.
• Finished product handling: conveying, weighing, packaging, transport, storage.

4. Process Flow by Investment Level

Budget sets the ceiling on mechanization and automation for the entire plant — it’s the constraint everything else gets designed around, not an afterthought layered on once the process is already mapped out.

These four decisions interact more than they look like on paper — a large-scale poultry feed plant choosing crushing-first batching almost always pairs with secondary crushing too, since both decisions point toward higher throughput and tighter formula accuracy together.

We’ve engineered both ends of this spectrum, from single-pulverizer setups for small mills to dual-stage crushing lines feeding multi-bin batching systems at full industrial scale, which is part of why we’d rather work through your actual output target and product mix with you directly than hand over a generic process template.

Layout decisions get locked in early, and reversing one after construction starts gets expensive fast. A few areas matter more than people expect going into the design phase.

Traffic and Material Flow

• Raw material trucks coming in and finished goods trucks going out should follow separate, non-crossing routes wherever the site allows — a single shared gate creates a bottleneck that slows both directions at once.
• Vehicle turning radius needs to account for firefighting vehicles, not just the standard delivery trucks used day to day.
• Parking should sit away from loading and unloading zones, so staff and visitor vehicles don’t block material flow during busy hours.

Utility and Infrastructure Placement

Machinery and Dust Control

• Equipment generating dust or noise should sit as far as practical from nearby residential areas, with blower duct outlets pointed away from those areas rather than toward them.
• Storage and frequently used equipment should follow the actual process sequence rather than whatever floor space happens to be open — walking distance between stages adds up across a full shift.

Pest Prevention

Rodents can’t crawl upside-down, so a platform extending roughly 0.6m (2 feet) beyond a 0.9m (3-foot) plinth wall creates an overhang they physically can’t climb past. Simple detail, but one of the more effective ways to keep rodents out of stored grain in a poultry feed plant.

A Few Things Often Left Off the Checklist

• Reserved space for future capacity expansion, so adding a second pellet mill or another silo later doesn’t mean demolishing something already built.
• A buffer zone around dust collection and ventilation outlets — separate from the residential buffer above — to manage noise alongside dust.
• Drainage and lighting planning around the building footprint, especially in regions with heavy seasonal rainfall.
• A dedicated quality control lab space, close enough to production for fast sampling but isolated enough to avoid contamination from dust or raw material handling.

Factory area planning is one of the things our design team does at no charge during the proposal stage, precisely because getting this wrong is one of the most expensive mistakes to fix later. If your site has constraints that don’t fit neatly into a standard layout — odd lot shape, height restrictions, an existing structure you’re building around — that’s exactly the kind of detail worth bringing to us before the layout gets finalized rather than after.

Yes, and getting this wrong is one of the more expensive mistakes to make early in a project — worth correcting a common misconception here too: it’s not that roller mills can’t handle flour. Roller mills are actually the standard choice for producing fine, uniform wheat flour. The real distinction runs the other way.

That’s why almost every poultry feed plant we build defaults to hammer mills rather than roller mills — a typical formula mixes corn, soybean meal, and various byproducts together, and a roller mill simply isn’t built for that kind of mixed-material versatility. If your raw material stream really is narrow and grain-dominant, a roller mill setup might be worth discussing, but that’s the exception rather than the default for poultry feed production.

Raw material affects more than just mill type, though:

• Moisture content above roughly 14-16% usually means adding a dryer to the line before crushing even starts.
• High-fiber materials — rice hulls, sunflower husk, straw — often need a coarser screen or a secondary grinding pass to process efficiently.
• Harder grains wear down screens and hammers faster than soft grain does, which affects maintenance intervals and spare parts planning, not just the initial equipment spec.

We’ve reviewed raw material samples directly from clients more than a few times before finalizing a crushing equipment configuration, since a formula description on paper doesn’t always match what actually shows up at the mill. If you’re not sure whether your raw material mix needs a standard hammer mill setup or something more specialized, that’s worth confirming with us before equipment gets ordered rather than after.

The ideal poultry feed plant capacity depends on your production goals, future expansion plans, feed formulas, and operating schedule. Selecting a system that is too small can create bottlenecks, while an oversized plant may increase unnecessary investment costs.

When evaluating capacity requirements, consider the following factors:

A common mistake is focusing only on current production needs. Many feed producers experience rapid growth after launching a new product line or expanding into new markets. Choosing a scalable solution from the beginning can significantly reduce future modification costs.

At RICHI, our engineers evaluate:

1. Raw material characteristics
2. Expected annual production volume
3. Pellet size requirements
4. Feed formulation complexity
5. Future business development plans

Based on these factors, we design a customized poultry feed plant solution that delivers stable output without excessive heat buildup, unnecessary wear, or efficiency losses during continuous operation.

Whether you need a small farm-scale feed mill or a fully automated commercial poultry feed plant, our engineering team can recommend the most cost-effective capacity configuration to maximize productivity, equipment lifespan, and long-term return on investment.

Absolutely. Before investing in a poultry feed plant, it is essential to evaluate both your available installation space and local power conditions. These factors directly influence equipment selection, plant layout, operating efficiency, safety, and future expansion possibilities.

A professional feed mill design is not simply about fitting machines into a building. The goal is to create a production flow that maximizes efficiency while ensuring safe and convenient operation.

Key Site Factors We Evaluate

Common Challenges in Existing Facilities

Many customers already own workshops or warehouses before purchasing a poultry feed plant. In these situations, our engineering team often helps solve challenges such as:

• Limited floor space
• Insufficient electrical capacity
• Low building height
• Irregular building layouts
• Restricted truck loading and unloading areas
• Multi-floor production requirements

Rather than recommending a standard configuration, we adapt the production line to the actual site conditions.

How RICHI Optimizes Plant Layout

Our engineers perform a comprehensive evaluation before finalizing the design:

1. Analyze the available workshop area and utility conditions.
2. Calculate total equipment power requirements.
3. Design efficient material transportation routes.
4. Minimize dead space and unnecessary conveyor distances.
5. Ensure smooth movement of operators, forklifts, and maintenance personnel.
6. Reserve space for future capacity upgrades.

This customized approach helps customers achieve higher production efficiency, lower operating costs, and safer daily operations.

One Poultry Feed Plant Does Not Fit Every Facility

Whether you are building a compact farm feed mill, a commercial poultry feed plant, or a large integrated feed manufacturing facility, the most effective solution is always site-specific.

With hundreds of feed mill projects completed worldwide, RICHI’s engineering team can design a poultry feed plant that matches your available space, electrical infrastructure, production targets, and long-term business plans—ensuring every square meter of your facility delivers maximum value.

RICHI is one of China’s leading poultry feed plant manufacturers, with hundreds of successful feed mill projects delivered across Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe, Oceania, and the Americas. We provide complete engineering services, customized solutions, strict quality control, professional installation support, operator training, and long-term after-sales service.

Yes. We supply complete chicken feed plants for sale on a turnkey basis, including process design, equipment manufacturing, plant layout, electrical control systems, installation guidance, commissioning, training, and ongoing technical support. From Nigeria to Saudi Arabia, from Indonesia to Peru, our project experience helps customers reduce risks and achieve faster returns on investment.